Support and maintenance is where the real cost of an OpenPass agreement accumulates, quietly and over years. The licence figure draws all the attention at signing, but maintenance is the recurring charge that follows it, and the OpenPass support and maintenance terms decide whether that recurring charge stays proportionate or climbs steadily for the life of the agreement. In an audit, maintenance also forms part of the remedy itself, because a finding is not just deemed licences at list price; it carries back maintenance and a first year of maintenance on the newly deemed licences alongside it. Understanding how these terms work is essential to keeping both the finding and the forward cost under control.
The buyer who treats maintenance as a fixed percentage that simply travels with the licence misses the levers. Maintenance is negotiable, the basis it is calculated on is negotiable, the uplift applied at each renewal is negotiable, and the way it stacks inside a compliance remedy is contestable. Each of these is a place where the recurring number can be brought down or held flat rather than allowed to compound.
Why maintenance dominates total cost
Over the defined term of an OpenPass agreement, the cumulative maintenance charge frequently exceeds the original licence cost. A maintenance fee calculated as a percentage of licence value, applied every year and uplifted at renewal, compounds in a way that a single licence purchase does not. This is why focusing only on the licence number at signing is a mistake: the buyer can win a strong discount on the licence and still face a maintenance stream that erodes the saving within a few years. The way the whole cost picture is assembled, licence plus maintenance plus reconciliation, is the subject of reducing total cost with an OpenPass conversion, and maintenance is usually the largest line in that picture.
The licence number gets the attention at signing; maintenance gets the money over the term. A fee that compounds every year quietly outgrows the original purchase.
The basis the fee is calculated on
A maintenance percentage means nothing without knowing what it is a percentage of. If maintenance is calculated on list price rather than on the discounted price the buyer actually paid, the effective rate is far higher than the headline figure suggests. A buyer who negotiates a deep licence discount but allows maintenance to be calculated on undiscounted list has given much of that discount straight back. The agreement should fix maintenance to the net price paid, not to list, and should state that basis explicitly so it cannot drift at renewal. This is closely tied to the wider question of how prices are held and uplifted across the term, examined in OpenPass price hold and uplift protections.
Renewal uplifts and the cap
The second lever is the annual uplift. Many agreements allow maintenance to rise by a fixed percentage each year, and without a cap that uplift compounds across the term into a substantial increase. The buyer should negotiate a firm cap on the annual maintenance uplift, ideally tied to a published index or a fixed low ceiling, so that the recurring cost remains predictable for the life of the agreement. An uncapped uplift turns a manageable maintenance line into an open ended liability, and it interacts with renewal pressure in ways that are examined in OpenPass renewal negotiation under audit risk. The cap should be agreed at the outset, when the buyer has leverage, rather than left to be contested at each renewal when the vendor holds the timing.
How maintenance stacks inside a finding
Maintenance is not only a forward cost; it is also part of the audit remedy, and this is where it does the most damage. When a finding determines that a buyer is noncompliant, the licensee is deemed to have acquired the missing licences at then current list price. On top of that deemed purchase, the remedy adds back maintenance and support, plus a first year of maintenance on the newly deemed licences, and the buyer also reimburses the costs OpenText incurs in performing the audit. One shortfall therefore becomes several charges stacked together, and maintenance appears in two of them. Unstacking that remedy line by line is central to how a finding comes down, and the mechanics of the conversion that replaces it are set out in converting an audit finding into a clean OpenPass deal. Pricing the deemed licences at list, and then layering maintenance on top of that inflated base, is precisely the kind of stacking a defense exists to take apart.
How this works in practice
In a recent engagement, an estate facing a compliance finding discovered that the proposed settlement priced the deemed licences at full list and then calculated both back maintenance and a first year maintenance charge on that same inflated base. The defense first reduced the underlying licence position through reconstruction, which lowered the base on which maintenance was calculated, and then addressed the maintenance terms directly: fixing the forward maintenance to the net price agreed rather than to list, and capping the annual uplift for the life of the new agreement. Reducing the base did double duty, because every dollar removed from the licence figure also removed the maintenance that would have been calculated on it. The reconstruction discipline behind that result is described in the complete OpenText audit defense playbook, and comparable outcomes appear across our engagements.
Negotiating the recurring number
Support and maintenance terms deserve the same scrutiny as the licence figure, because over the term they usually cost more. Fix the maintenance basis to the net price you actually pay, cap the annual uplift at the outset, and in any compliance settlement insist that maintenance is calculated on a reduced and defensible licence position rather than on a base inflated to list. Done well, the recurring cost stays proportionate and predictable. Done poorly, it compounds quietly into the largest line in the agreement. This work is part of our OpenPass enterprise agreement negotiation track, and it rests on the same independent baseline that underpins every credible number, set out in building an OpenPass target baseline before negotiation. If you are negotiating or renewing OpenPass support and maintenance terms, open a case before the recurring cost is locked in.
If an OpenText or Micro Focus audit notice has arrived, the first seven days matter more than any week that comes after. OpenText Audit Defense is an independent, buyer side practice founded in 2020 by former vendor compliance leadership. Across more than 200 defended audits we have reduced the average finding by 68 percent and mitigated more than $90M in claims against vendor positions. We do not resell OpenText software and we are not affiliated with OpenText Corporation. To open a case, use the contact form on this site.